PortfoliosLab logo
RECS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RECS and ^GSPC is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RECS:

0.72

^GSPC:

0.66

Sortino Ratio

RECS:

1.03

^GSPC:

0.94

Omega Ratio

RECS:

1.15

^GSPC:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

RECS:

0.67

^GSPC:

0.60

Martin Ratio

RECS:

2.58

^GSPC:

2.28

Ulcer Index

RECS:

4.84%

^GSPC:

5.01%

Daily Std Dev

RECS:

19.33%

^GSPC:

19.77%

Max Drawdown

RECS:

-34.29%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

RECS:

-3.38%

^GSPC:

-3.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RECS achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 0.51% return.


RECS

YTD

0.81%

1M

6.34%

6M

-2.08%

1Y

13.82%

3Y*

14.04%

5Y*

16.74%

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

0.51%

1M

6.15%

6M

-2.00%

1Y

12.92%

3Y*

12.68%

5Y*

14.19%

10Y*

10.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


S&P 500

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RECS vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RECS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RECS is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RECS is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RECS is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RECS is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RECS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RECS is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RECS Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RECS and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Drawdowns

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and ^GSPC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 4.94% and 4.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...